Thanks Sherman!

On 05.01.2015 22:10, Xueming Shen wrote:

Just wonder if we really need that "inQuotes" logic here? A straightforward approach might be "every time you have a quote, skip everything until you hit another one, when counting,
or copy everything into the buffer until hit another one, when copying" ?

I agree it would work, but, in my opinion, it would be a bit more complicated.
The counting loop would look something like this:
------------------------------------
        outerLoop: for (int i = 0; i < ldLen; ++i) {
            char ch = ldPath.charAt(i);
            if (mayBeQuoted && ch == '\"') {
                thereAreQuotes = true;
                for (++i; i < ldLen; ++i) {
                    if (ldPath.charAt(i) == '\"') {
                        continue outerLoop;
                    }
                }
                break; // unpaired quote
            } else if (ch == ps) {
                psCount++;
            }
        }
------------------------------------
which is 3 lines longer, comparing to the loop with inQuotes flag.


Since you are making copy (into the temporary buffer) anyway for "quote" case, another approach might be to pre-scan the input propName first for quote, if there is one, make a clean copy of the propName without those quotes, then go to the original implementation.

Unfortunately, it wouldn't work in those rare cases, where the PATH contains a quoted path with semicolon in it. Windows allows semicolon in the file names, and it seems to be the only reason to allow quoting the PATH entries.

Sincerely yours,
Ivan

This logic can be implemented at the very beginning as

private static String[] intializePath(String propname) {
   if (ClassLoaderHelper.allowsQuotedPathElements) {
       ...
   }
    ...   // existing implementation
}

-Sherman

On 01/05/2015 10:10 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Ivan,

Looks pretty good.

Just a thought on ClassLoader:1754; If you avoid the local for ClassLoaderHelper.allowsQuotedPathElements then the compiler can optimize the code and may do dead code elimination since it is a final static boolean.
On Mac and Unix it reduces to just the original code.

(ClassLoaderHelper seems like a weak case for a separate class, IMHO)

$.02, Roger


On 1/5/2015 12:49 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
Hi Roger!

I've updated the webrev similarly to what you've suggested:
1) Presence of quotes is checked when counting the separators.
2) If quotes weren't found, we'll execute the same optimized loop as for Unix.

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8067951/4/webrev/

Sincerely yours,
Ivan


On 05.01.2015 18:40, Roger wrote:
Hi Ivan,

For this small difference in the implementations, I'd recommend against having two different source files. The path initialization function is a one time function and
the performance improvement is not significant.

 I'd suggest a few comments on your 2nd version[1].

- The windows check should check the system property or other definitive os check
  and could be better expressed (as Alan suggested) as quotesAllowed.
- in the loop testing for the quote (") can come before the quotesAllowed check to speed things up (no need to check if they are allowed if they do not occur).
  This code is unlikely to be executed enough times to optimized.

Roger

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8067951/2/webrev/

On 1/4/2015 3:23 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:

On 04.01.2015 22:50, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/01/2015 17:39, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:

Currently, there are tree variants of ClassLoaderHelper: for Windows, for Unix and for MacOS. We have to either duplicate code in Unix and MacOS realizations, or introduce another Helper class for initializing paths only, which would have only two realizations: for Windows and all Unixes.
When I made the comment then I was thinking of a method such as allowsQuotedPathElements (or a better name) that returns a boolean to indicate if quoting of path elements is allowed or not. That would abstract the capability a bit without needing to do isWindows checks.

Ah, I see.
Though, not needing to check for quotes allows a bit more efficient implementation, so splitting the code for different platforms may also make sense.

I did it with another helper class in this webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8067951/3/webrev/

Sincerely yours,
Ivan


-Alan.












Reply via email to