Hi Martin, Nice catches on the cleanup!
By the way, can you tell me why you used named loops in your code? Isn't it considered bad practice as it is almost like a goto statement? Couldn't we refactor it in a way that we do not use named loops? Also, if there is a for loop that has no start statement and no condition (like this: for (;; i++) ), then is a for loop a good choice for that code? I'm just wondering, maybe there are some points of view that I'm not considering... Regards, Zoltan On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Vitaly Davidovich <vita...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Try -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:DisableIntrinsic:_indexOf >> > > Thank you very much! Hard to find because -XX:+PrintFlagsFinal is > insufficient - also needs -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions >
