Seems OK, but: UOE should be specified in ProcessBuilder if and only if it is also specified for the Runtime.exec family of methods, since they are wrappers around ProcessBuilder.
Because there are so many methods, it may be better to have a blanket UOE disclaimer added to the class descriptions instead - adding UOE to every process-related method exceeds the normal bar for pedantry in the JDK documentation. On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote: > Please review this clarification to the optional behavior of > java.lang.Runtime and java.lang.ProcessBuilder > on platforms that don't support process creation. > > Webrev: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-process-8055330/ > > Issue: > 8055330 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055330 > > ps: approved by CCC > > >
