On 02/18/2015 02:32 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote: > It's an awful lot of pain to avoid what IMO should be an obvious addition: > > (Short|Character|Integer|Long).(get|put)(Little|Big)EndianBytes([value,] > byte[] b, int offs) > > This could (it seems to me) be easily intrinsified, is hugely useful > both within and outside of the JDK,
Sure, I get that, but it's a new API. Once I've finished this work, implementing such an API would be trivial. I have no objection to it in principle, but making ByteBuffer.map() operations work well is worth doing too. Andrew.
