Hi Ivan,

I really appreciate you and others for proactively contributing to the jaxp code. Unfortunately, I have to say sorry that it may be not feasible to apply this patch. The reason is that the patch covers just the BCEL component, but the upstream source had been updated already. The proper way to fix these warnings is therefore getting the updates from the upstream source.

As described here http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/, it would be nice if you could discuss your intended change within the alias before investing significant time working on it (I saw that you did list three bugs that you intended to work on).

Thanks,
Joe

On 3/3/2015 9:09 PM, huizhe wang wrote:

On 3/3/2015 6:21 PM, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hi Ivan,

I've skimmed over the patch and didn't see anything technically amiss. However, I believe at least some of the changes, such as adding @Deprecated and the generification updates will need to go through an internal review process before they can be pushed.

Joe Wang (cc'ed as huizhe.w...@oracle.com) is the jaxp lead and he will also need to review of the changes for jaxp-specific concerns.

Just coming back from a two-week vacation, I have a lot of catch-ups to do. Please allow me some time to get to this.

Thanks,
Joe


Thanks,

-Joe

On 3/3/2015 10:06 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote:
Hi Joe,

The links are correct, but our server was down for a while. It is available now.

Regards,
Ivan

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Joseph D. Darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com <mailto:joe.da...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Hello,

    Sorry for the belated reply, I tried the URLs and some obvious
    variations, but the webrevs didn't come up as being there.

    Have they been moved?

    Thanks,

    -Joe

    On 2/18/2015 12:17 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov wrote:

        Hi Joe, core libs developers,

        Last night we had a hackathon in Bulgarian Java User Group.
        Its purpose was to work on fixing some compiler warnings in
OpenJDK. The day before the meeting we ran the following command:

        make clean
JAVAC_WARNINGS="-Xlint:all,deprecation,rawtypes,unchecked,cast,serial,dep-ann,static,fallthrough,try,varargs,empty,finally
        -Xmaxwarns 10000" DISABLE_WARNINGS="-Xlint:all" LOG=info images

        After that, looking at the build.log, we identified the
        following number of warnings per repo left to be fixed:

        359 corba
        100 jaxp
        500 jaxws
        0 nashorn

        We decided to take the jaxp repository, where the situation
        was the following:

        rawtypes 43
        unchecked 14
        serial 32
        cast 10
        dep-ann 1

        The latter three types were easy to fix. After we did them,
        we created our first webrev for the night:

http://bgjug.sty.bz/bgjug/~bgjug/fix-warnings-jaxp-part1/webrev.00/
<http://bgjug.sty.bz/bgjug/%7Ebgjug/fix-warnings-jaxp-part1/webrev.00/>
<http://bgjug.sty.bz/bgjug/%7Ebgjug/fix-warnings-jaxp-part1/webrev.00/>

        Later we continued with rawtypes and unchecked. We didn't fix
        them all, as some of the warnings concerned public method
        parameters, which change might virtually break client code.
        The good news here is that all these public methods belong to
        classes located in 'internal' packages. Which we hope will
        not be public any more once project Jigsaw meets java.xml
        module :)

        Anyway, this is the second webrev that we created:

http://bgjug.sty.bz/bgjug/~bgjug/fix-warnings-jaxp-full/webrev.00/
<http://bgjug.sty.bz/bgjug/%7Ebgjug/fix-warnings-jaxp-full/webrev.00/>
<http://bgjug.sty.bz/bgjug/%7Ebgjug/fix-warnings-jaxp-full/webrev.00/>

        As its name implies, it contains all the fixes that we did
        last night.

        We would be happy to get feedback from you and even happier
        if this becomes our first contribution to OpenJDK as part of
        our adoption efforts.

        Regards,
        Ivan, Bulgarian JUG






Reply via email to