On 10/03/2015 5:53 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
David at all,

May I consider the fix as reviewed and continue with integration?

Seems okay to me.

David

-Dmitry


On 2015-02-24 05:23, David Holmes wrote:
On 24/02/2015 12:02 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Hi Everyone,

Webrev updated in-place (press shift-reload)

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8073584/webrev.01/

share/native/libunpack/jni.cpp

295     return (jobject) NULL;

Why do you need a cast on NULL?

Updated formatting.

Hack in main.cpp replaced with true error check.

Not sure it is appropriate to lump the "res != 1" in with the CR error.
Doesn't this case deserve its own u.abort(xxx) ?

Thanks,
David

-Dmitry


On 2015-02-23 05:07, David Holmes wrote:
On 21/02/2015 4:27 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Hi Everyone,

It's my $0.02 to the warning cleanup work. Please review:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dsamersoff/JDK-8073584/webrev.01/

Notes:

I use an ugly trick: (void) (read() + 1) to get rid of ignored value
warning because since gcc 4.6 just (void) is not enough.

Why not just check the return value for correctness?

David


-Dmitry






Reply via email to