On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote:
> > I am all for clearing up the language here, but think it prudent to hold > off doing much until the language for JMM revisions and VarHandle is > produced, then we can revisit. > I'm disappointed we can't add such a small and safe doc fix now. I agree the public docs for replacements for Unsafe methods will be much harder (and more important) to get right. Especially if they include wording and API that help those familiar with C/C++11 atomics, as I would like.
