Thanks!

On 07.04.2015 20:48, Lance Andersen wrote:
Hi Alexander,

InTypeCode.java you might want to use {@code} vs <code> so that you do not have to use &gt; &lt;

Otherwise it is OK

Best
Lance
On Apr 7, 2015, at 1:00 PM, alexander stepanov <alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com <mailto:alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>> wrote:

Hello Roger,

Thank you for the notes, fixed:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8039440/webrev.01/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/portable/package.html.udiff.html <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eavstepan/8039440/webrev.01/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/portable/package.html.udiff.html>
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8039440/webrev.01/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/ShortHolder.java.udiff.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8039440/webrev.01/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/TypeCode.java.udiff.html

Regards,
Alexander

On 07.04.2015 18:20, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi,

Just a few minor comments;  no need for another webrev (on my account).

The preferred form for code markup is {@code } instead of <code>... </code>
and <tt>... </tt> but that may beyond the scope of the current issue.

- Lowercase markup <p> is preferred over uppercase <P> but per file conventions should be consistent.

+++ new/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/portable/package.html 2015-04-07 16:41:12.299150361 +0400

-<li>Delegate
+<li><*code*>Delegate</*code*>

(RR) Why is this list element in code, the others are not.

+++ new/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/ShortHolder.java 2015-04-07 16:41:09.883150470 +0400
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
/**
 * The Holder for <tt>Short</tt>.  For more information on
 * Holder files, see <a href="doc-files/generatedfiles.html#holder">
- * "Generated Files: Holder Files"</a>.<P
+ * "Generated Files: Holder Files"</a>.*<P>*

(RR) <p> should be on a new line; before the paragraph it separates

+++ new/src/java.corba/share/classes/org/omg/CORBA/TypeCode.java 2015-04-07 16:41:10.567150439 +0400

@@ -164,9 +164,9 @@
 *
* Java IDL extends the CORBA specification to allow all operations permitted
 * on a <code>struct</code> <code>TypeCode</code> to be permitted
- * on an <code>exception</code> <code>TypeCode</code> as well. <p>
- *
+ * on an <code>exception</code> <code>TypeCode</code> as well.
 */
+
public abstract class TypeCode implements IDLEntity {

(RR) There should not be blank line between comment and class definition.


Thanks, Roger


On 4/7/2015 10:40 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,

I'm not if the mail list is correct, but could anyone please review the following fix?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8039440/webrev.01/

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039440

Just an HTML markup fix for CORBA.

Thanks,
Alexander




<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif><http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>




Reply via email to