On Jun 15, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Martin Buchholz <marti...@google.com> wrote:
> This is a fine fix for a jdk8 backport. > Thanks, i deliberately kept it simple to make the backport easier. > In pursuit of even more perfection for jdk9, we might do some more fiddling > later. Ok. > It bothers me that not all the traversal loops in LTQ work the same. Other > traversal loops simply skip over matched request nodes, but the spliterator > traversals do not (although the difference may be undetectable). > I would guess Iterator traversal is probably complicated by having to support Iterator.remove. Paul. > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Please review: > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psandoz/jdk9/JDK-8085978-linked-transfer-queue-traverse/webrev/ > > The LinkedTransferQueue's spliterator can erroneously report internal nodes > when traversing. > > The fix is cherry picked from the 166 repo (other mostly refactoring-based > changes will occur later on with bulk updates). I would also like to backport > to 8u60. > > Paul. >
