Hi Alexander,
On 8/5/15 2:01 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Stuart,
Please see the final version of File.java (please update the page) -
just replacing <tt> with <code> in the mentioned places:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/webrev.01/src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/File.java.udiff.html
The specdiff reports for lang and io:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/specdiff.io/overview-summary.html
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/specdiff.lang/overview-summary.html
This looks good to me as well.
best regards,
-- daniel
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/4/2015 12:47 AM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I think Pavel's advice to run specdiff is useful. It's not too
difficult to run and in this case it provides a useful cross-check
for making a large number of markup changes. Contact me directly if
you need help with specdiff. I've run specdiff over your webrev.01
and I've posted the results here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/8132468/specdiff.01/overview-summary.html
They show that of all the changes you made, only four are considered
significant from specdiff's point of view. Of these, two appear to be
merely whitespace issues, but there are two changes that do appear
significant:
File(URI) // constructor
File.toURI()
In both cases the italic 'f' is intended to be a metasyntactic
variable, not an actual variable that's part of the code. The italic
'f' should be restored. In the case of File.toURI() it appears that
the resulting code is now malformed, so there's clearly an error here.
You and Daniel Fuchs had an exchange about this a bit earlier. I
suspect the reason for the that appears between the opening
parenthesis and the italic 'f' is so that the tail of the 'f' doesn't
crash into parenthesis. In other words, the is there merely
for typographical purposes. I suspect that after you restore the
italic 'f' it'll look bad, so you'll want to restore the as well.
s'marks
On 8/3/15 9:03 AM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Pavel
> Hi Alexander, if I were you I would run specdiff
Thanks; but sorry, I'm afraid I haven't enough time for the extra
experiments
just now...
> It's very easy to go the all the way and lose oneself in there :)
please accept my condolences :)
Regards,
Alexander
On 8/3/2015 6:33 PM, Pavel Rappo wrote:
On 3 Aug 2015, at 16:07, Alexander Stepanov
<alexander.v.stepa...@oracle.com>
wrote:
Please see the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132468/webrev.01/
removed wrapping <code></code> around the links (mostly
PrintStream.java,
PrintWriter.java, File.java), plus other changes in File.java
Thanks,
Alexander
Hi Alexander, if I were you I would run specdiff against the
changes and
upload it along with the RFR.
P.S. "I've tried it once, it was awful." [1] It's very easy to go
the all the
way and lose oneself in there :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-December/030262.html
-Pavel