> > So Windows has no operation which can remap a previously mapped section of > memory to something else? (say, just a block of non-access memory) > > Note that such an operation has to be atomic with respect to all other > operations which affect the address space of the process (or at least, > which may randomly choose an address in memory at which to create new > mappings), but not with respect to anything else really. The point of the > remapping is to continue to reserve the address space, without actually > referencing what was there before (thus dodging file lock issues). No > physical or virtual memory need actually be reserved for such a mapping. > > -- > - DML >
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unmap method to M... Paul Sandoz
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unmap method... Andrew Haley
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unmap me... Paul Sandoz
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unma... Andrew Haley
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add ... Andrew Haley
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 ... Remi Forax
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unmap me... David M. Lloyd
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unma... Mike Hearn
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add ... Dawid Weiss
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add ... David M. Lloyd
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 ... Mike Hearn
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724... Mike Hearn
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724... Vitaly Davidovich
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unma... Andrew Haley
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add unma... Andrew Haley
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 (Add ... David M. Lloyd
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724038 ... Andrew Haley
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724... David M. Lloyd
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724... Andrew Haley
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724... David M. Lloyd
- Re: Suggested fix for JDK-4724... Mike Hearn