Hi, i wanted to start a discussion/review-process some time ago, see the second-try below.
Is there someone who wants to discuss/review/sponsor these changes? Else, should i link my result as reference into the JBS? For the two other affected mailing-lists/repos (macos-port-dev[0],net-dev[1]) i created a subtask for each. If this three patches here cannot go into one review, i would create subtasks for those as well, to handle the different state of theses changes . -- Sebastian [0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/macosx-port-dev/2015-October/006985.html [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2015-November/009308.html On 10/27/2015 05:32 AM, Sebastian Sickelmann wrote: > Hello, > > Actually I am searching through the JBS for low hanging fruits. > Right now i am looking through the openjdk-sources and try to evaluate > if i can make something about JDK-5108778. > > Please find my webrevs for the jaxp, jaxws and corba repos at: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/jaxp/webrev.00/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/jaxws/webrev.00/ > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sebastian/5108778/corba/webrev.00/ > > I hope for jaxp,jaxws and corba this mailinglist is also the right place. > > jaxp: > For the change in XBoolean (jaxp) i thought it would be more readable > than the autoboxing solution. > > jaxws: > The changes in jaxws are in a generated class. I would love to fix this > in the source, but i have no clue where the real source could be. > > corba: > For all calls against > com.sun.tools.corba.se.idl.constExpr.Expression.value(Object) i used the > valueOf solution instead of the autoboxing for better readability. > > -- Sebastian > >
