> On 9 Nov 2015, at 14:36, Claes Redestad <claes.redes...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Vladimir,
> 
> thanks for asserting this.

Indeed!


> The j.l.invoke code is still rather foreign to me, so I took extreme 
> precautions to not change any semantics.
> 
> Simplified thusly:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8141678/webrev.03/
> 

Much better.

Paul.

> Effects remain largely the same.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /Claes

Reply via email to