Have you looked anything at the performance of the generated code? As
you may have seen I was playing around with an alternative
implementation[1] which has the benefit of being pure C++ without
compiler specific hints. That said, when I did some initial benchmarking
of that it did seem like the performance impact was significant. I
didn't have time to look at more in detail why, and will not have time
to return to that until late next week earliest. It would be interesting
to understand what type of performance you see with your patch.
Cheers,
Mikael
[1]
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mikael/webrevs/8141491/webrev.01/webrev/jdk.patch
On 2015-11-25 11:42, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
Sending to core-libs mailing list.
On 11/25/15 2:19 PM, Alexander Smundak wrote:
Please take a look at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmundak/8141491/jdk/webrev.00
that fixes the problem.
It utilizes the ability of some (GCC and Clang) to declare data
alignment explicitly.
I have verified it works on x86_64 Linux by running
jdk/test/java/nio/Buffer/Basic.java test
I need a sponsor.
Sasha
