On 03/12/15 21:47, John Rose wrote: > We are takeing a crack at it with Panama, since using C APIs > often requires timely deallocation of (non-Java) temps.
Indeed it does, and I guess I'll wait. I'm a bit disappointed because I quite fancied trying to do mapped ByteBuffer.close(). While I could hold off and wait for your more ambitious solution, I wonder if it makes more sense for me to do something anyway. Some big data people seem to be suffering with this problem, so a solution to just ByteBuffers might be more timely than Panama. Andrew.
