> On Dec 18, 2015, at 2:12 AM, Peter Levart <peter.lev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Now that PhantomReference(s) (excluding sun.misc.Cleaner(s)) are treated > equally to sun.misc.Cleaner(s), the split between _discoveredPhantomRefs and > _discoveredCleanerRefs is not needed any more right? Will this be a separate > simplification?
Yes that’s the plan. http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8143847 Mandy
