>From the name of the test and looking at the code, running in English only
is fine.
Stephen

On 27 January 2016 at 05:53, Masayoshi Okutsu <masayoshi.oku...@oracle.com>
wrote:

> Looks OK to me. But I'd like some java.time people to review this change
> to see if the intention of this test is to run only in English.
>
> Thanks,
> Masayoshi
>
>
> On 1/27/2016 1:51 PM, Ramanand Patil wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> Please help me in reviewing this test fix.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ramanand.
>>
>> From: Ramanand Patil
>> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 1:05 PM
>> To: i18n-...@openjdk.java.net
>> Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: <i18n dev>RFR: JDK-8147912: test "parseWithZoneWithoutOffset" of
>> java/time/tck/java/time/format/TCKDTFParsedInstant.java fail on de_DE locale
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>   Please review the trivial test bug fix for:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147912
>>   Bug Description: Since the test case "parseWithZoneWithoutOffset" is
>> using hard code as input data it will fail on some non-English locales
>> (de_DE locale).
>>   Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8147912/webrev.00
>>   Fix: Even though hardcoded data is not preferred in compatibility test
>> cases, this case was exception. English is provided as the default locale
>> data for DateTimeFormatter in this testcase.
>>   Regards,
>> Ramanand.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to