> On Mar 23, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Peter Levart <peter.lev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Kim, > > Thinking more about your approach. Basically your idea is to detect that > there are no more unprocessed but pending or enqueued Cleanables by timing > out on waiting for next Cleanable to be processed. In that case the timeout > should be reset when each Cleanable is detected to be processed so that when > there's a "silence" detected for at least the whole timeout period, we can > claim with enough probability that there are no more unprocessed Cleanables > either pending or enqueued and that we can give up with OOME.
Exactly, and much better stated than I did.
