> On Apr 3, 2016, at 8:47 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Updated webrev, as per comments:
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8153181/01/
> 
> getVMTemporaryDirectory could be moved into jdk.internal.perf.Perf, which
> would move its native implementation into the VM, perf.cpp, but it doesn’t
> seem worth it, unless future refactoring wanted to get rid of
> JVM_GetTemporaryDirectory.
> 

It looks okay.   We should look into this when we look into future clean up 
work in this area.

Mandy

Reply via email to