> On Apr 3, 2016, at 8:47 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Updated webrev, as per comments: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8153181/01/ > > getVMTemporaryDirectory could be moved into jdk.internal.perf.Perf, which > would move its native implementation into the VM, perf.cpp, but it doesn’t > seem worth it, unless future refactoring wanted to get rid of > JVM_GetTemporaryDirectory. >
It looks okay. We should look into this when we look into future clean up work in this area. Mandy