Thanks Martin and Roger, hope to see this in Java 9 :)
> On Apr 26, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Created https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8155102 to track the request.
>
>
> On 4/26/2016 10:30 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The pid (though os specific) is available from the Process API and so adding
>> it to toString
>> does not expose any additional implementation specific information.
>>
>> Getting accurate values for exitcode and running status would require a
>> native call
>> on windows but might be ok only for debugging.
>>
>> $.02, Roger
>>
>>
>> On 4/25/2016 3:49 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>>> This is a reasonable request.
>>>
>>> But if you put platform-specific information into the String, then
>>> people will start treating that as an API (parsing the string), which
>>> is undesirable.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Steven Schlansker
>>> <stevenschlans...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi core-libs-dev,
>>>>
>>>> I recently was diagnosing a problem relating to an external program
>>>> invoked via
>>>> the ProcessBuilder API.
>>>>
>>>> The returned Process is an instance of java.lang.UNIXProcess, which does
>>>> not have a toString method.
>>>>
>>>> While I understand that the concepts of "pid" etc are not cross-platform,
>>>> it might be useful to operators to have the toString method
>>>> dump them as diagnostic information.
>>>>
>>>> Imagine if instead of
>>>>
>>>> "java.lang.UNIXProcess@<hashCode>"
>>>>
>>>> you could see
>>>>
>>>> "UNIXProcess[running=true, pid=1234]"
>>>> "UNIXProcess[running=false, exitCode=127]"
>>>>
>>>> This seems like it would be a fairly trivial change that could help some
>>>> operator down the road.
>>>>
>>>> Is this a reasonable request? Thanks,
>>>> Steven
>>>>
>>
>
