> > I meant change the shape of the VarHandle produced by: > > MethodHandles.byteArrayViewVarHandle > MethodHandles.byteBufferViewVarHandle >
Aaaha:) I must say, one reason, why I'd like to have it wrapped is that VarHandle.get/set do not have fixed typed signature. Helper.longAt(arr, index) looks much better than SOME_STRANGE_CONSTANT.get(i can write here what I want and compiler says nothing:); > The problem is feature complete is very close and it will be hard, but not > impossible, to make changes afterwards. > I should have started to write here earlier;). So, what will we do with it? Jaroslav
