> On 30 Jun 2016, at 09:37, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 30/06/16 02:20, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> VarHandle.compareAndSet is strong in two ways - non-spurious and >> sequentially consistent. >> >> VarHandle.weakCompareAndSet is weak in both these ways. >> (That seems like a mistake to me. >> The fact that j.u.c. Atomic classes are a precedent for this seems >> unfortunate.) > > Is your disagreement purely about the name?
I was also wondering if that was the source of disgreement. Paul. > We have all of the variants we need. >