Mandy, can you please give a look to the first email in this thread and see
if you believe the enhanced message I suggested is helpful? I think it
would be.

On Jul 11, 2016 8:32 PM, "Mandy Chung" <mandy.ch...@oracle.com> wrote:

>
> > On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Alan, I wish I found this before I responded to you, but, anyway, here
> you
> > go:
> >
> > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160698
> > "java --dry-run should not cause main class be initialized”
> >
>
> Yes this has been fixed.
> Mandy
>
> > Cheers,
> > Paul
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> So I just tested "--dry-run" and I see it does load the class. My
> >> apologies. I was following the commit trail but somehow the loading of
> the
> >> class escaped me. I swore at one point it wasn't loading, but my error,
> >> nevertheless.
> >>
> >> Was there any debate on this issue? The problem I currently see with
> >> loading the class is you're still allowing static initializers to run. I
> >> don't see a purpose in loading the class here because you're potentially
> >> allowing user code to execute and causing side-effects in the JVM. If
> the
> >> purpose of JDK-8159596 is to test the resolving of the
> >> configuration/options, I don't see how the current behavior is therefore
> >> desired. To take an analogy, the Maven Release Plugin has a "dry run"
> >> feature to test an install. It actually doesn't do an install. But
> someone
> >> can make the argument (and I am) that Java's --dry-run is not actually
> dry.
> >> It's really just a "--no-main" but user code can still run.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11/07/2016 22:01, Paul Benedict wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The current help of --dry-run is this:
> >>>> "create VM but do not execute main method"
> >>>>
> >>>> But I think it's pretty important to note that the class is also not
> even
> >>>> loaded.
> >>>>
> >>> The main class should be loaded. The original intention was that it do
> >>> everything except invoke the main method.
> >>>
> >>> -Alan
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to