Hi Martin,
On 11/08/2016 11:34 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Again, no spec changes, but larger than expected.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/
The StampedLock functional changes look okay.
Thanks,
David
---
Joe and Amy may be interested in
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/jsr166-jdk9-integration/test-stabilization/
where we rewrite flaky tests with new mechanisms that are hopefully less
flaky.
We have some footprint tests that try to catch memory leaks, using
reflective methods that the jigsaw folks might frown upon. There seems
to be a need for module-privileged code for e.g. whitebox testing and
running a debugger. Perhaps these tests will be an example of code so
privileged, someday. Or we could decide such tests are more trouble
than they're worth and simply discard them.
