On 08/15/2016 08:59 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 15/08/16 18:40, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> On 08/15/2016 08:15 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> has anyone looked at this yet? I've just got back from my travels. >> >> I think it was reviewed and committed, as "HG Updater" comments say: >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162458 > > Hmm, okay. I didn't see a reply to the email. > > It's in hs but not hs-comp. Do you have any idea why hs is used and > not hs-comp, or vice versa? I'd love to know which one I'm supposed > to use for development.
Paul said in original RFR: "I will push to hs since that is where JDK-8151163 and it has not been integrated into jdk9/dev." http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-July/042605.html This must be one of those cases where deviating from the usual integration paths just snowballs. Waiting for JDK-8151163 to sync down to hs-comp, pushing the patch there, and waiting for hs-comp to integrate back would leave hs broken for too long... Thanks, -Aleksey
