> On Aug 24, 2016, at 9:26 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Kim, > > Sorry this fell off the radar …
That’s okay. There was a long gap while I was working on other things. > On 24/08/2016 7:09 AM, Kim Barrett wrote: >> Mandy asked for some additional comments to make life easier for >> future readers. I've also stopped pretending the description for >> waitForReferenceProcessing is javadoc, since this function is private >> and only accessible via SharedSecrets or reflection that avoids access >> control. >> >> Changes only in the jdk tree: >> >> New webrevs: >> full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8156500/jdk.05/ >> incr: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8156500/jdk.05.inc/ > > Just to be clear, in waitForReferenceProcessing() you are okay with returning > true on spurious wakeup? Yes. >> Unchanged hotspot webrevs: >> full: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8156500/hotspot.04/ >> incr: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8156500/hotspot.04.inc/ > > No further comments from me. > > Thanks, > David
