> On Oct 19, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Alexandre (Shura) Iline
> <alexandre.il...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Mandy,
>
> I have a question around line 228 of
> src/jdk.jdeps/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdeps/JdepsTask.java:
> 224 new Option(false, "--list-deps", "--list-reduced-deps") {
> 225 void process(JdepsTask task, String opt, String arg) {
> 226 task.options.showModulesAddExports = true;
> 227 task.options.reduced = opt.equals("--list-reduced-deps");
> 228 task.options.verbose = PACKAGE;
> 229 }
> 230 },
>
> What is the expected behavior of jdeps if I use ‘—list-jdeps’ at the same
> time as, say, ‘-v’?
>
-v (or other verbose options) specifies the granularity of analysis.
-—list-deps only does package-level analysis and so verbose option has
essentially no effect.
> Should there be more checks similar to these?
> 483 if ((options.findJDKInternals) && (options.hasFilter() ||
> options.showSummary)) {
> 484 showHelp();
> 485 return EXIT_CMDERR;
> 486 }
> 487 if (options.showSummary && options.verbose != SUMMARY) {
> 488 showHelp();
> 489 return EXIT_CMDERR;
> 490 }
>
> Looking on already existing options, with the current implementation, for
> ‘-s’ and -v’ options:
> ‘-v' ‘-s’ causes ‘-v' to be ignored
> ‘-s' ‘-v’ is not allowed.
>
-s and -v are conflicting options and both cases should not be allowed. It’s a
bug.
> If used with ‘-jdkinternals', ‘-s’ is not allowed, while ‘-v’ is ignored.
-jdkinternals and -v and -s are conflicting options. Can you file an issue for
this bug? I will need to take a pass on all options and should also consider
subcommands.
Mandy
