Hi Thomas , thanks for looking into it .

I suggest  to handle the read issue in another bug  because this one just deals 
with “jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar” .

( there seem to be  a few other read(…) calls  in the jdk code base to consider 
as well )

Can we push the existing change ?

Regards, Matthias


From: Thomas Stüfe [mailto:thomas.stu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 1. März 2017 12:47
To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>
Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; Simonis, Volker <volker.simo...@sap.com>
Subject: Re: RFR [XS] : 8175000 : jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar

Hi Matthias,

the fix makes sense, this is very clearly a bug.

I'd suggest a simpler fix though:

                      end -= 4; // make sure there are 4 bytes to read at start
-                     while (start < end) {
+                    while (start <= end) {

Note that the code has a diffent bug too, very unlikely but not impossible to 
hit:

 321         ssize_t count = read(fd, buf, CHUNK_SIZE);
 322         if (count >= MIN_SIZE) {

We attempt to read CHUNK_SIZE bytes and require the read to have returned at 
least MIN_SIZE (something like 30ish bytes). If not, jexec fails.

read may have been interrupted (EINTR) or may have returned less bytes than 
MIN_SIZE, so it should read in a loop til eof or CHUNK_SIZE bytes are read.

Kind Regards, Thomas


On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Baesken, Matthias 
<matthias.baes...@sap.com<mailto:matthias.baes...@sap.com>> wrote:
Ping ...

Can I get a review please for the change ?


Thanks, Matthias

From: Baesken, Matthias
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017 12:28
To: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>' 
<core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>>
Cc: Langer, Christoph 
<christoph.lan...@sap.com<mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com>>; Erik Joelsson 
(erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com>) 
<erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com>>; 'Michel Trudeau' 
<michel.trud...@oracle.com<mailto:michel.trud...@oracle.com>>
Subject: RE: RFR [XS] : 8175000 : jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar

Here is  the webrev for jdk9 :

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8175000/


?  And btw I really wonder  - is  jexec still needed in future jdk's like jdk10 
 ? Seems it is not used much .

?

In case  jexec will stay in  the jdk  I might add a test for the tool as well, 
if there is interest  ( could not really find one that tests execution of a 
simple jar-file with jexec).

Best regards, Matthias


From: Baesken, Matthias
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017 07:39
To: 'core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>' 
<core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net><mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>>>
Cc: Langer, Christoph 
<christoph.lan...@sap.com<mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com><mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com<mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com>>>;
 Erik Joelsson 
(erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com><mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com>>)
 
<erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com><mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com>>>
Subject: RE: RFR [XS] : 8175000 : jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar

Hello,  probably I should add the info that the fix is needed  in jdk9 as well 
, not only jdk10 .

Without the fix jdk9/10    show this error  when executing a small  example jar 
:

/myjdk9/images/jdk/lib/jexec      /java_test/hellojar/helloworld.jar
invalid file (bad magic number): Exec format error

with the fix :

jdk/lib/jexec    /java_test/hellojar/helloworld.jar
Hello world from a jar file


And btw I really wonder  - is  jexec still needed in future jdk's like jdk10  ? 
Seems it is not used much .

Best regards, Matthias


From: Baesken, Matthias
Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2017 18:16
To: 
core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net><mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>>
Cc: Langer, Christoph 
<christoph.lan...@sap.com<mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com><mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com<mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com>>>;
 Erik Joelsson 
(erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com><mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com>>)
 
<erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com><mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com<mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com>>>
Subject: RFR [XS] : 8175000 : jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar

Hello , when looking into  the jexec build I noticed   that  execution of a 
simple helloworld.jar   with jexec does not work any more.

I did a little patch for this which adjusted the addition done with  CR  
8156478: 3 Buffer overrun defect groups in 
jexec.c<https://javapartner.oracle.com/mproxy/repository/technology/java2/jdk9/jdk/rev/4f96129b45ee>
  .

Could I have a review ( just a diff this time is provided because of 
infrastructure issues) for it ?


Thanks, Matthias

Bug :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175000


Diff for jdk10  :

# HG changeset patch
# User mbaesken
# Date 1487782485 -3600
#      Wed Feb 22 17:54:45 2017 +0100
# Node ID 93d55a711f3b1c3f282e6889c24d13f16d4a4548
# Parent  884872263accabd4ab68d005abd4e5393144aa4f
8175000: jexec fails to execute simple helloworld.jar

diff --git a/src/java.base/unix/native/launcher/jexec.c 
b/src/java.base/unix/native/launcher/jexec.c
--- a/src/java.base/unix/native/launcher/jexec.c
+++ b/src/java.base/unix/native/launcher/jexec.c
@@ -331,8 +331,9 @@
                 off_t end   = start  + xlen;

                 if (end <= count) {
-                    end -= 4; // make sure there are 4 bytes to read at start
-                    while (start < end) {
+                    // make sure there are 4 bytes to read at start
+                    end -= 3;
+                    while ((start < end) && (start < count-3)) {
                         off_t xhid  = SH(buf, start);
                         off_t xdlen = SH(buf, start + 2);

Reply via email to