> On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 15/03/2017 19:42, Mandy Chung wrote:
>
>> StackWalker::getInstance is currently specified to check for
>> StackFramePermission("retainClassReference“) due to an early review feedback
>> . Given it has only one target, it’s overkill to define a specific
>> permission type for stack walking use. This patch proposes to replace the
>> StackWalker permission check with
>> RuntimePermission("getStackWalkerWithClassReference”) and remove
>> StackFramePermission class.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8176815/webrev.00/
>>
> The target name is long but I agree with removing this permission (and the
> changes look good).
An alternative target name is “getStackWalker” that I suggested previously but
doesn’t seem attracting to other. It’s hard to anticipate if a different
target name is needed in the future.
Another reason why I’m okay with this long name because it’s one character less
than another target name:
* <td>setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler</td>
Mandy
