Hi Thomas, Chris.

I updated the webrev with Chris's suggestion and will push after tests complete. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-processhandle-onexit-8176272/index.html <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erriggs/webrev-processhandle-onexit-8176272/index.html>

Thanks for the review and comments, Roger


On 3/16/2017 10:00 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Thanks Roger. This looks good to me now.

Thomas

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com <mailto:roger.ri...@oracle.com>> wrote:

    Hi Thomas,

    Good idea.  Though it is unlikely that the pid would be re-used
    between the checks of isAlive
    but that will remove any window.

    Updated webrev:
    
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-processhandle-onexit-8176272/index.html
    
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erriggs/webrev-processhandle-onexit-8176272/index.html>

    Thanks, Roger



    On 3/15/2017 4:19 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
    Hi Roger,

    when using isAlive0, would it may make sense to - on the first
    invocation - remember the process start time and on subsequent
    invocations to check this time against the new return value? That
    way you could check for process identity in the case of recycled
    process ids.

    Kind Regards,Thomas

    On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Roger Riggs
    <roger.ri...@oracle.com <mailto:roger.ri...@oracle.com>> wrote:

        Please review a change to the implementation of
        ProcessHandle.onExit to
        correctly handle waiting for any process to terminate and a
        corresponding new test.
        On Linux, waitpid only waits for direct children; waiting for
        non-children
        now polls for termination.

        Please review and comment:

        Webrev:
        
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-processhandle-onexit-8176272/index.html
        
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erriggs/webrev-processhandle-onexit-8176272/index.html>

        Issue:
        https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176272
        <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176272>

        Thanks, Roger







Reply via email to