On 05/26/2017 12:51 PM, Jason Mehrens wrote: > So it should be safe to do an ordered 'list' type element comparison > if and only if you have determined that both sets/maps use the same > ordering. In your example code you are missing the check to make sure > the comparators are both null or equal.
Yes; this check must be added. > > Seems like a worthwhile RFE. In general, though I tend to think of > use cases for ConcurrentSkipListSet as "wildly mutating" which means > you never call Set equals or equals fails pretty early due to the > mutation. > However, this technique might apply more usefully to TreeSet. -Doug
