Thanks for the immediate response.
Having read the thread, I understand the argument against including Pair in the
JDK and personally agree with the sw engineering argument. But, it got into
javafx.util somehow and is now effectively part of the JDK anyway, so that ship
has sailed. Thus, it seemed reasonable me to just copy it from there into
java.util, though there would be a maintenance headache if it were desired to
keep them sync’ed.
I suppose also that there’s a pov that having it in javafx.util indirectly
encourages JavaFX adoption. (
Anyhow, thanks for the explanation.
Paul
On 7/13/17, 10:22 AM, "joe darcy" <joe.da...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Paul,
See the discussion in thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010-March/003973.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010-April/thread.html
In short, no current plans to add java.util.Pair.
-Joe
On 7/13/2017 10:07 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> See the ancient https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4947273.
>
> At Amazon, many projects depend on JavaFX to get only a single class,
namely javafx.util.Pair. That means that we must distribute OpenJFX along with
our internal OpenJDK distribution, or split javafx.util.Pair out into a
separate package, both of which we’d like to avoid in the future. So, are there
any plans to add java.util.Pair to JDK10?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
