Hi,
One option is to make code the function in a private method and use a
method reference.
But the code to generate the binding and the lambda mechanism would
still look appear like magic.
Thanks, Roger
On 8/21/2017 9:42 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I suspect this won't save any stack frames in the stack-starved
thread... but seems like small progress nevertheless.
Perhaps lambdas that are likely to show up in stack traces should be
given real static classes with good names to make those stack traces
more readable.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Roger Riggs <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Please review a change to the process reaper completion handler's
choice of an anonymous inner class
for more consistent stack usage. Additional background and
discussion in the issue 8173817 [1].
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-stackoverflow-8173817/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erriggs/webrev-stackoverflow-8173817/>
Issue:
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173817
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173817>
Thanks, Roger
