Hi Roger,
On 8/31/17 6:27 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Naoto,
In the non-javatime case(line 95), is the change from style == LONG to
style & LONG !=0 correct?
I would not have expected to see a change in that case given the bug.
It will now be ignoring the STANDALONE bit in the style.
Yes, the change in non-javatime case is intentional. If the base style
is LONG, non-abbreviated name should be used no matter the style is
STANDALONE or FORMAT.
If so, the patch is fine as is.
Thanks!
Naoto
Thanks, Roger
On 8/30/2017 6:55 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi,
Please review the fix to the following issue:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180469
The proposed changeset is located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8180469/webrev.00/
The problem was caused by the difference of the Era display name for
"SHORT" style between java.time and java.util.Calendar.
Naoto
