I think i prefer toImmutableList() than toUnmodifiableList() because the List is truly immutable and not an unmodifiable proxy in front of a mutable List (like Collections.unmodifiableList() does).
Rémi ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> > À: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Mercredi 22 Novembre 2017 16:42:56 > Objet: Re: RFR(m): 8177290 add copy factory methods for unmodifiable List, > Set, Map > On 19 November 2017 at 03:34, John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com> wrote: >> Meanwhile, `toUnmodifiableList` is so ugly to the ear, >> eye, and fingers that it will be less used just because of >> its long spelling. > > Many developers are already using Google Guava which has added > toImmutableList() and friends. More widely, we use the toXxx() form > for all the collectors we've written (in OpenGamma Strata). As such, I > think the toXxx() naming is well established at this point, and > toUnmodifiableList() will be fine. > > Stephen
