On Dec 20, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote:

> I was a little lassiaz-faire given that 8K bytes were anyway being allocated 
> upfront. Peter’s changes look good.
> 
> Brian, i would double check the tests to make sure the various code paths are 
> tested.


http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8193832/webrev.03/

The patch is updated to:

* use Peter’s approach to avoid allocating an ArrayList when length <= 
DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE;
* use the default ArrayList constructor instead of that with a specific initial 
capacity;
* update the test to ensure that lengths which require three buffers are 
covered.

Thanks,

Brian

Reply via email to