On Jan 22, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22/01/2018 21:12, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> >> I can change it. The reason I used that verbiage was to match that of >> read(byte[]): >> >> "The read(b) method for class InputStream has the same effect as: >> read(b, 0, b.length)" >> > True but the equivalent in readAllBytes won't guarantee that readNBytes is > called (which I think is what you were trying to do in the latest version). I have updated this verbiage in place in webrev.02 and webrev.01-02. Thanks, Brian
