On 02/28/18 11:58 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 28/02/2018 16:57, Randy Crihfield wrote:
poke poke can someone please review? Thanks
The `release` is a properties file so I assume you can simplify the
test by using Properties.load and then testing if the "SOURCE" key is
present and whether it has the expected value.
-Alan.
I could though I actually already wrote the test as requested initially
and read the file as desired at that time, which is in the workspace.
The current incantation is to expand the test to also check a closed
build and streamline, rather than write two tests.
I would like to get approval as it is, but if I need to go back and
change existing behavior I will.
Randy