On 2018-06-26 19:51, Stuart Marks wrote:
Peter Levart wrote:

Also, performance would be better if it was a separate class. It could be a superclass of ListItr so that common logic is not duplicated.

This isn't at all obvious. Certainly it's not obvious enough to embark on a refactoring without doing some benchmarking.

However, I want to fix this bug in JDK 11. If somebody wants to do some benchmarking, they're welcome to do so, but I don't want to consider this as part of this changeset.

I don't have time to do any benchmarking here, sorry, but could counter-speculate that the tests are likely to be eliminated by the JIT anyway, and that keeping only one implementation class might allow some hypothetical callsite to stay mono- or bimorphic that would otherwise become bi- or megamorphic. So yes, it's not obvious that splitting will improve performance.


@Stable annotation on private final boolean isListIterator does not help here unless the returned Iterator object is assigned to a static final field and used from it. Hardly a common use case for Iterator(s) I guess.

The exact effect of @Stable is Hotspot-specific and changes over time. Here we're using it as a declaration that this final field really can be treated as final, and that it won't be modified via reflection or a varhandle, thus enabling VM more aggressive optimizations.

+1, even though I suspect Peter is right for now. :-)

The patch at hand looks good to me as-is.

Thanks!

/Claes

Reply via email to