Hi, Roger Thanks a lot for your review and comments, inline and update new webrev as below, please have a review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xyin/8198882/webrev.03/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xyin/8198882/webrev.03/> > On 24 Jul 2018, at 1:05 AM, Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Sorry to be late to the review cycle. > > The use of initializer blocks instead of constructors reduces the readability > of the code. > A simple fix is to add the constructor declarations ahead of the initializer > to make the code more readable. Fixed, use constructor now instead of initialization block, thanks > > GetAttrsBase: 69: The signature of setMandatoryAttrs could be > setMandatoryAttrs(String...) would allow > the mandatory strings to be passed without explicit array creation and would > still allow > String[] to be passed where more convenient. Changed with your suggested style > > GetAttrsBase: 53: The exception message would be more readable as: > "Attributes to be verified is null” Sure, changed the exception msg as you suggested > > GetAttrsNotFound: 50: throw the fail exception here; hiding it in the > verifyAttributes > method is harder to understand Fixed, removed verifyAttributes override method and throw exception directly in runTest() > > GetNonstandard: 87, 93: Printing the expected and actual arrays on failure > (regardless of debug) will help diagnose failures more quickly Sure, put expected and actual arrays in exception msg and simplify condition check > > GetNumericIRRs/GetNumericRRs: Tests like this are so abstract that is it > difficult to see what > is being tested. For example, where does getIndex() get its value? > Either more comments are needed or more expressive method names. Yep, let me try to expand the key test method into test directly, there will be some redundancy, but should be more clear to see what we want to test > > DNSTestUtils: 94: Don't encourage the usage allowing separation of -D from > the argument. > Its not allowed by the normal command line parsing and should not be > supported. > (Yes, I know it is/was not changed by this review). Sure, removed this kind of usage support > > :153: cleanupClosableRes does not appear to be used; if it is not needed, > remove it Yes, removed > > A lot of the test framework is embodied in these DNSTestUtils without > explanation or comment. > It will help future maintenance, if there is a class level description > (prose) describing > the sequence of events for tests. I add some javadoc to those DNSTestUtils, base sequence in TestBase class description, hope that will be helpful Thanks & Regards, Chris > > Regards, Roger > > > On 7/13/18 2:14 AM, Chris Yin wrote: >> Hi, Vyom >> >> Thank you for the review and comments, update webrev as below and comment >> inline >> >> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xyin/8198882/webrev.02/ >> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xyin/8198882/webrev.02/> >> >> >>> On 13 Jul 2018, at 1:46 PM, vyom tewari <vyom.tew...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> Thanks for doing this overall looks good to me, few minor comments. >>> 1-> DNSTestUtils.java, please start the server first and then set the >>> "TEST_DNS_SERVER_THREAD". This will not make much difference but we will >>> avoid setting "TEST_DNS_SERVER_THREAD" env variable if server fails to >>> start. >>> 129 env.put(TEST_DNS_SERVER_THREAD, inst); >>> 130 inst.start(); >> Fixed, thanks >> >>> 2-> I noticed that copyright date (Copyright (c) 2000, 2018,) but webrev >>> tells all the tests are new, please fix copyright date as well. >> Thanks for checking this. Since this task is part of umbrella enhancement >> JDK-8191011 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8191011> JNDI SQE >> tests co-location, for those added tests which are migrated from SQE tests, >> the copyright date will follow the guidance SQE Test copyright year + >> migration copyright year if the 2 year are not same, for dump files (like >> *.dns) are new added under our new framework so just use current copyright >> year, hope that explains :), thanks >> >> Regards, >> Chris >> >>> Thanks, >>> Vyom >>> >>> On Thursday 12 July 2018 02:08 PM, Chris Yin wrote: >>>> Please have a review to new webrev as below, some code refactoring on lib >>>> parts and enhanced DNSServer to handle retry request which will make the >>>> tests more stable, thanks >>>> >>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xyin/8198882/webrev.01/ >>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Exyin/8198882/webrev.01/> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Chris >>>> >>>>> On 22 Mar 2018, at 11:16 AM, Chris Yin <xu.y....@oracle.com >>>>> <mailto:xu.y....@oracle.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Please review the changes to add 10 JNDI tests to >>>>> com/sun/jndi/dns/AttributeTests/, thanks >>>>> >>>>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198882 >>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198882> >>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xyin/8198882/webrev.00/ >>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Exyin/8198882/webrev.00/> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Chris >
