I’m attempting to clarify the meaning/intent of the language in the
specification of the identity-finish characteristic of collectors.
The javadoc reads:
Indicates that the finisher function is the identity function and
can be elided. If set, it must be the case that an unchecked cast
from A to R will succeed.
In the following code the second sentence clearly indicates that the second
cast from A to R must succeed. What I’m trying to confirm however is that the
first sentence is intended to require that the finisher is a true identity
function, so the result of the collector must be one of the instances created
through the supplier, and that therefore the cast from R to A is also safe.
public static void main(String[] args) {
Stream<String> a = Stream.of("foo", "bar", "baz");
Stream<String> b = Stream.of("alice", "bob", "eve");
System.out.println(collect(Stream.of(a, b), partitioningBy(s ->
s.startsWith("b"), toList())));
}
public static <T, A, R> R collect(Stream<Stream<T>> streams, Collector<T, A, R>
collector) {
if
(collector.characteristics().contains(Collector.Characteristics.IDENTITY_FINISH))
{
return streams.map(s -> s.collect(collector))
// Indicates that the finisher function is the identity function and
can be elided.
.map(r -> (A) r)
.reduce(collector.combiner())
// If set, it must be the case that an unchecked cast from A to R will
succeed.
.map(a -> (R) a)
.orElse(Stream.<T>empty().collect(collector));
} else {
return streams.flatMap(identity()).collect(collector);
}
}
Thoughts, opinions?
Thanks,
Chris Dennis