HI Daniel, That does look messed up. Thanks for pointing it out. I will investigate.
Thanks, Brian > On Dec 3, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fu...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Looks good to me, though I don't understand the change > at line 154: > > The comment says: > > 152 // skip(n) returns negative value: IOE > > but if you pass -1 - you're no longer calling skip(n)?