On 21/02/2019 12:57, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > thanks for giving this advice! It confirms the problems I see.
You are welcome. > For the context: > The idea was to implement this in Java using StackWalker and > ASM. If I had the right bytecodes, and the right starting point, > ASM would be helpful to implement the analysis I think. Ok. However, if you have the appropriate method bytecodes and the BCI at which the exception occurred then I'm not sure why you would need ASM. Also, it was not strictly correct when I said all that is retained is the method bytecodes. Exception tables, line number tables and local var name & type tables are also retained. regards, Andrew Dinn ----------- Senior Principal Software Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903 Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander