Ivan,
There seem to be more places that use a somewhat similar pattern. I was
wondering if you have seen them and decided not to include them in your patch
for some reason (e.g. they really are quite different)?
Here are some of them:
java.io.BufferedInputStream
java.io.InputStream
java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder
java.nio.file.Files
java.util.ArrayDeque
java.util.Hashtable
java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap
java.util.concurrent.PriorityBlockingQueue
java.util.regex.Pattern.quote
There is also some number of occurrences in the jdk.* modules.
> On 9 May 2019, at 02:50, Ivan Gerasimov <ivan.gerasi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Jdk has several places with similar logic: an array needs to be reallocated
> (by at least some defined amount), taking into account the maximum allowed
> size of arrays.
>
> There's clearly an opportunity for refactoring, so it is proposed to
> introduce a dedicated utility method for calculating the best new size of an
> array.
>
> Would you please help review this enhancement?
>
> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223593
> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8223593/00/webrev/
>
> Mach5 job ran fine.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Ivan Gerasimov
>
