Hello,

While doing some other work, I noticed that java.lang.Number relies on an implicit default constructor. Until there is a lint warning to find these cases systematically (JDK-8071961: Add javac lint warning when a default constructor is created), please review the diff below to address this particular instance.

Thanks,

-Joe


 public abstract class Number implements java.io.Serializable {
     /**
+     * Constructor for subclasses to call.
+     */
+    public Number() {super();}
+
+    /**

Reply via email to