Looks okay.
Should the test be removed from the catch-all group as part of this change?
-Joe
On 6/4/2019 5:53 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
This test was added some time ago, but it wasn't added to the
jdk_collections test group. Please review the patch appended below,
which adds it to the right group. (The test was still run as part of
the catch-all jdk_util_other group though.)
Bug link: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225315
s'marks
diff -r ef23ea332077 test/jdk/TEST.groups
--- a/test/jdk/TEST.groups Tue Jun 04 11:55:51 2019 -0700
+++ b/test/jdk/TEST.groups Tue Jun 04 17:52:11 2019 -0700
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@
java/util/AbstractList \
java/util/AbstractMap \
java/util/AbstractSequentialList \
+ java/util/ArrayDeque \
java/util/ArrayList \
java/util/Arrays \
java/util/BitSet \