Hi Igor, On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 11:37 -0700, Igor Ignatyev wrote: > > Hi Severin, > > the updated webrev looks good to me, please see a couple comments below.
Thanks. More below. > Cheers, > -- Igor > > > On Jul 17, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Severin Gehwolf <sgehw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Misha, > > > > On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 10:22 -0700, mikhailo.seledt...@oracle.com wrote: > > > Hi Severin, > > > > > > On 7/17/19 5:44 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > > Hi Igor, Misha, > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 11:49 -0700, Igor Ignatyev wrote: > > > > > Hi Severin, > > > > > > > > > > I don't think that tests (or test libraries for that matter) should > > > > > be responsible for setting correct PATH value, it should be a part of > > > > > host configuration procedure (tests can/should check that all > > > > > required bins are available though). in other words, I'd prefer if > > > > > you remove 'env.put("PATH", ...)' lines from both DockerTestUtils and > > > > > TestJFREvents. the rest looks good to me. > > > > Updated webrev: > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8227642/02/webrev/ > > > > > > > > No more additions to PATH are being done. > > > > > > > > I've discovered that VMProps.java which defines "docker.required", used > > > > the "docker" binary even for podman test runs. This ended up not > > > > running most of the tests even with -Djdk.test.docker.command=podman > > > > specified. > > > Good catch. > should we rename docker.support and DOCKER_COMMAND to something more abstract? container.support and CONTAINER_ENGINE_COMMAND perhaps? > > > > I've fixed that by moving DOCKER_COMMAND to Platform.java so > > > > that it can be used in both places. > > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > > > (of course, the alternative would be to import > > > jdk.test.lib.containers.docker.DockerTestUtils into VMProps.java -- not > > > sure if there are any potential problems doing it this way) > > > > I've tried that but for some reason this was a problem and VMProps > > failed to compile. I don't know exactly how those jtreg extensions work > > and went with the Platform approach. Hope that's OK. > > all files needed for VMProps (or other @requires expression class) > have to be listed in requires.extraPropDefns or > requires.extraPropDefns.bootlibs property in TEST.ROOT file in all > the test suites which use these extensions. we are trying to be very > cautious in what is used by VMProps (directly and indirectly) so > these lists won't grow and we won't require any modules other than > java.base, given DockerTestUtils has dependencies on a number of > other library classes, the Platform approach is much better from that > point of view. I had a feeling it was something like that. Thanks for the explanation! Cheers, Severin