On 8/28/19 7:38 AM, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi, we currently spin code for a non-sensical invokeVirtual DMH, so let's remove that. Such methods are benign since we won't ever attempt to resolve such nonsensical forms, but surely a waste of space. This patch tightens checks conservatively (could possibly apply the same restriction to invokeSpecial?) and adds a few negative tests using inputs that jlink should refuse.
I also think same check (first parameter is the receiver) can be applied to invokespecial for DMH.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8230302/webrev.00/
This looks okay. It'd be good to move away from hardcoded defaults as tracked by JDK-8230301.
Mandy
