Hi Mandy,

On 2019-09-06 21:07, Mandy Chung wrote:
Hi Claes,

The patch looks much straightforward than I expected.

thanks? :-)


The original default hardcoded list includes many more forms.  What is the diff of the jlink-plugin generated classes before and after this patch?

I wonder if we should include a few other method types in HelloClassList like float parameter.  While they are not used in the startup benchmarks, they may be used for some other application runtime which has been benefit from jlink-time generated classes.
Yes, there's a reduction of forms pre-generated by this, but that's sort
of the point since the list of defaults was picked by me during JDK 9
development to fit the needs of the lambda metafactory the ISC we had
back then. Since both have been refactored over the last 4 feature
releases, many of the shapes herein now can never be requested by the
current ISC implementation, and are likely dead weight.

So I think of this cleanup as reclaiming some footprint that we can
spend on widening the API coverage in HelloClasslist to include things
that are more likely to be used by a large set of applications.

I do think there's a small risk this cleanup removes a handful of oft-
used shapes, but I'm not sure if it'll ever register as a measurable
regression. It's possible, sure, so I'd prefer to do an exploratory
tuning round to patch this up as a follow-up RFE, and have that effort
be guided by any regressions we (or others) may be able to detect due
this cleanup.

Thanks!

/Claes

Reply via email to