On 9/17/19 3:00 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/09/2019 19:25, Joe Wang wrote:
:
I deliberately left the javadoc in the SAX package as they are. But I
agree it may be worth it to address this aspect of the document. I
suggest we do so with a separate doc-only request[1] to clarify the
relationship with the SAX project, likely adding a short note in the
package description and removing all other references. If you are
okay, I'll keep this changeset the way it is, limiting it to the new
method.
A separate issue is fine but I think important to do it in the same
release where the APIs diverge to avoid confusing the reader (by
redirecting them to stale API docs).
Agree, will do it next while we all are here on the issue.
-Joe
-Alan
